The State of Michigan has released MEAP Scores today. They are available on both the Detroit Free Press website and the State of Michigan Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability website. The OEAA website also breaks down the scores by the levels of Advanced, Proficient, Partially Proficient, and Not Proficient. However, it is more difficult to do a year to year comparison as only one year’s data is shown at a time. Rochester Patch has also provided breakdowns by school and district averages for Rochester Community Schools.
I’ve included Rochester Community Schools (our district), Albion Public Schools (our superintendent-select’s district), and statewide data.
Raw MEAP Scores
Here are the Raw MEAP Scores from 2006 to 2010 for Rochester, Albion, and Statewide.
Regarding Rochester, results were mixed, but there were no significant swings of 5 or more points district-wide. Individual schools have not been examined.
For Albion, results were also mixed, but there were some significant swings of greater than 5 points.
- Third-grade math went down 5.8
- Fourth-grade reading was up 11.8
- Fifth-grade math was up 5.6
- Fifth-grade reading was up 9.6
- Sixth-grade math was down 5.4
- Sixth-grade social studies was up 5.2
- Seventh-grade math was up 13.6
- Eighth-grade math was up 18.8
- Eighth-grade science was down 8.3
District
|
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
|
|
|
3rd grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
95.5% |
1095 |
94.8% |
1087 |
2007 |
97.4% |
1078 |
96% |
1071 |
2008 |
96.9% |
1042 |
94.6% |
1034 |
2009 |
99% |
1085 |
97.3% |
1081 |
2010 |
98.8% |
1023 |
93.2% |
1018 |
Compare |
3.3 |
|
-1.6 |
|
4th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
94.7% |
1094 |
94.5% |
1087 |
2007 |
96.8% |
1112 |
95.3% |
1104 |
2008 |
96.3% |
1090 |
94.9% |
1083 |
2009 |
98.4% |
1048 |
94.2% |
1044 |
2010 |
97.4% |
1134 |
94.2% |
1129 |
Compare |
2.7 |
|
-0.3 |
|
5th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
93.5% |
1128 |
96.1% |
1120 |
95.4% |
1128 |
2007 |
94.8% |
1102 |
94.6% |
1091 |
95.4% |
1101 |
2008 |
95% |
1128 |
95.3% |
1112 |
95.5% |
1127 |
2009 |
94.3% |
1118 |
95% |
1114 |
94.4% |
1117 |
2010 |
94.4% |
1070 |
95.6% |
1062 |
93.6% |
1070 |
Compare |
0.9 |
|
-0.5 |
-1.8 |
|
|
6th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Social Studies |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
92% |
1128 |
96.2% |
1120 |
91.7% |
1126 |
2007 |
92.7% |
1147 |
95.2% |
1137 |
91.1% |
1146 |
2008 |
94.3% |
1135 |
94.2% |
1128 |
92.4% |
1134 |
2009 |
95.9% |
1137 |
96.7% |
1138 |
90.1% |
1146 |
2010 |
94.5% |
1157 |
95.1% |
1157 |
92.2% |
1157 |
Compare |
2.5 |
-1.1 |
0.5 |
7th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
90% |
1118 |
95% |
1110 |
2007 |
91% |
1148 |
91% |
1145 |
2008 |
94% |
1178 |
93.7% |
1171 |
2009 |
95% |
1129 |
95.6% |
1125 |
2010 |
95.3% |
1165 |
93.8% |
1162 |
Compare |
5.3 |
-1.2 |
|
8th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
91.9% |
1120 |
94.7% |
1116 |
92.4% |
1120 |
2007 |
90.8% |
1153 |
93.7% |
1147 |
93% |
1151 |
2008 |
92% |
1163 |
92% |
1156 |
92% |
1165 |
2009 |
89.6% |
1178 |
95.5% |
1178 |
91.7% |
1185 |
2010 |
93.6% |
1147 |
94.8% |
1144 |
92.9% |
1147 |
Compare |
1.7 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
|
.
.
.
District
|
ALBION PUBLIC SCHOOLS
|
|
|
3rd grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
91.9% |
86 |
84.9% |
86 |
2007 |
85.9% |
78 |
80.8% |
78 |
2008 |
97.4% |
77 |
80.8% |
78 |
2009 |
100% |
78 |
80.5% |
77 |
2010 |
94.2% |
69 |
81.4% |
70 |
Compare |
2.3 |
|
-3.5 |
|
4th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
82.4% |
68 |
80.6% |
67 |
2007 |
74.7% |
75 |
78.7% |
75 |
2008 |
84.1% |
69 |
69.6% |
69 |
2009 |
98.5% |
65 |
73.8% |
61 |
2010 |
98.4% |
61 |
85.5% |
62 |
Compare |
16 |
|
4.9 |
|
5th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
52.9% |
87 |
67% |
88 |
68.2% |
85 |
2007 |
56.9% |
58 |
76.4% |
55 |
68.4% |
57 |
2008 |
68.3% |
60 |
54.2% |
59 |
70% |
60 |
2009 |
72.2% |
72 |
70.4% |
71 |
72.2% |
72 |
2010 |
77.8% |
45 |
80% |
45 |
73.3% |
45 |
Compare |
24.9 |
|
13 |
5.1 |
|
|
6th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Social Studies |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
56.7% |
90 |
77.5% |
89 |
62.9% |
89 |
2007 |
38.3% |
81 |
63.3% |
79 |
51.9% |
81 |
2008 |
64.9% |
57 |
72.4% |
58 |
69.1% |
55 |
2009 |
83.7% |
49 |
75.5% |
49 |
59.2% |
49 |
2010 |
78.3% |
60 |
75.4% |
61 |
64.4% |
59 |
Compare |
21.6 |
-2.1 |
1.5 |
7th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
25% |
92 |
80.2% |
91 |
2007 |
43% |
86 |
50.6% |
85 |
2008 |
47.8% |
67 |
56.7% |
67 |
2009 |
67.3% |
55 |
54.5% |
55 |
2010 |
81.8% |
44 |
59.1% |
44 |
Compare |
56.8 |
-21.1 |
|
8th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
41.9% |
86 |
56.3% |
87 |
59.8% |
87 |
2007 |
33.3% |
87 |
55.2% |
87 |
45.3% |
86 |
2008 |
58.4% |
77 |
58.4% |
77 |
64.9% |
77 |
2009 |
33.8% |
71 |
62.5% |
72 |
54.2% |
72 |
2010 |
52.6% |
57 |
58.6% |
58 |
43.9% |
57 |
Compare |
10.7 |
2.3 |
-15.9 |
|
.
.
.
District
|
STATEWIDE
|
|
|
3rd grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
87.9% |
117088 |
87.4% |
116464 |
2007 |
90.2% |
115560 |
86.4% |
114870 |
2008 |
91.3% |
115323 |
86.4% |
114591 |
2009 |
94.8% |
113005 |
89.8% |
112375 |
2010 |
95.3% |
110058 |
86.8% |
109935 |
Compare |
7.4 |
|
-0.6 |
|
4th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
84.6% |
117078 |
84.9% |
116371 |
2007 |
85.8% |
115702 |
84.5% |
114950 |
2008 |
87.9% |
114239 |
82.8% |
113561 |
2009 |
92.3% |
113736 |
84.1% |
113045 |
2010 |
91.5% |
112919 |
84.1% |
112549 |
Compare |
6.9 |
|
-0.8 |
|
5th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
75.9% |
117827 |
84.1% |
117193 |
82.8% |
117959 |
2007 |
74.2% |
116046 |
81.6% |
115371 |
81.7% |
116024 |
2008 |
76.8% |
115037 |
81.5% |
114426 |
83.1% |
115093 |
2009 |
79.5% |
113025 |
85.2% |
112509 |
81% |
113869 |
2010 |
79.9% |
114234 |
85.1% |
113922 |
78.1% |
114368 |
Compare |
4 |
|
1 |
|
-4.7 |
|
|
6th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Social Studies |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
69% |
121506 |
83.3% |
121117 |
74.3% |
121599 |
2007 |
72.7% |
117925 |
81.8% |
117412 |
72.6% |
117968 |
2008 |
79.9% |
116266 |
80.5% |
115728 |
73.6% |
116272 |
2009 |
82% |
114497 |
87.7% |
114180 |
73.4% |
115532 |
2010 |
84.5% |
114137 |
84% |
113971 |
75.3% |
114479 |
Compare |
15.5 |
0.7 |
1 |
7th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
64.3% |
124763 |
79.7% |
124474 |
2007 |
72.7% |
121763 |
72.5% |
121310 |
2008 |
82.6% |
117869 |
79.6% |
117519 |
2009 |
82.2% |
115602 |
82% |
115402 |
2010 |
84.6% |
115756 |
79% |
115696 |
Compare |
20.3 |
-0.7 |
|
8th grade
|
Math |
Reading |
Science |
|
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
Met |
Included |
2006 |
68.1% |
126803 |
75.6% |
126689 |
74.9% |
126964 |
2007 |
71.6% |
122797 |
77.1% |
122418 |
79.2% |
122780 |
2008 |
74.5% |
120049 |
75.5% |
119665 |
76.3% |
119827 |
2009 |
70.3% |
116008 |
83.4% |
115936 |
75.9% |
116820 |
2010 |
78% |
115602 |
81.9% |
115551 |
78.1% |
115618 |
Compare |
9.9 |
6.3 |
3.2 |
|
.
.
.
MEAP Score Comparison by Proficiency Level
What I find more interesting is comparing MEAP Proficiency Levels (Excel Spreadsheet) between the districts. Of the 79% of those who met or exceeded standards on the state level on the various exams, an average of 46% were advanced and 54% were proficient. In Rochester Community Schools, the percent of advanced was significantly higher. Of the 92% who met or exceeded standards, 69% were advanced and 32% were proficient. In Albion, the numbers were essentially reversed. Of the 78% who met or exceeded standards, 37% were advanced and 63% were proficient. (Advanced is the higher level.)
Example bell curves of the three groups would look something like this:



Why did I present this data? I didn’t do it to knock Albion, but it does need to be shown that there is substantial difference between the two districts in terms of MEAP Scores. Saying that in one district, 92% met or exceeded standards and the other 78% met or exceeded standards does not show the full gulf between the academics of the two districts.
Second, this gulf is going to get much wider very soon. New MEAP cut scores are coming out next year. My guess is that they will be fairly close to the Advanced cut score on the current tests. If this is the case, Rochester would have had 72% of student’s exams at met or exceeded standards and Albion would have 29%. (State numbers would be 41%.) Looking at the MME results, even moving cut scores to the Advanced mark would appear to be too low to predict college readiness.
There are significant demographic differences between Rochester and Albion that account for some of the differences in MEAP scores. I give Mr. Clarke credit that Albion’s MEAP scores in math did increase while he was superintendent and MEAP scores in reading appear to have begun increasing as he stated. But the enormous gulf in MEAP scores between Albion and Rochester still raises the question of if there will need to be a significant mindset change for him to be an effective superintendent here. Time will tell and our community will need to help with information and support to assist him in his new role.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
I like the graphs, Joshua. I had never looked at it that way. Interesting.
If you are still in a number cruching mood, you should take a look at districts with demographics similar to Rochester, such as Grosse Pointe, B’ham, Bloomfield, Troy, Forest Lake, East Lansing, Ann Arbor, Novi, etc…
Those will be much more meaningful comparisions than just looking at the statewide averages.
The ACT comprehensive college readiness benchmark score disparity between Rochester (34.7%) and Albion (4.9%) is even more dramatic.
Rochester’s college-readiness trend data can and should provide fundamental metrics for assessing Mr. Clarke’s effectiveness as superintendent.
Let’s hope the school board will track these trends carefully.